Skip to main content

FORGET ABOUT THE USA, MOVE ON!

Law without enforcement is paper text.

Rules. What are the rules? Human rights? For who and by whom?

The global elites have overlooked one fundamental aspect of a legal system, namely, including law enforcement. They overlooked that if within a group the rules (maybe not even on paper written) the group confirms, it looks like no enforcement is needed. And international, the global liberal elites have forgotten that their policeman with the gun to enforce the agreed laws, was the USA.

  


Since Trump is in office, this has changed rapidly. To protect freedom and security in Europe, Europa now requires urgently to rethink the global law enforcement order.

I think that on the level of cooperation at the top level (army) of policing rules and laws, we have to differentiate between the global shipping (ocean) rule base and the nation border rule base.

As I wrote on my blog of 17 September 2024 with the title “The worn out world order”, we require change in the world order because the current one is worn out.

We require the United Oceans as successor to the United Nations and the Atlantic Rules Enforcement as successor to the NATO. We (the whole free world) requires a law enforcement system to deal with the Houhtis and the Bab al-Mandab Strait. The UN again and again has proven to be a paper tiger.

Next to that, countries or free trade zones on land need good law enforcement to protect the zones, borders. If you have rules for crossing the borders, you need to have the deterrence of enforcement. Without that, you as well could have no borders. The EU failed to protect its borders regarding illegal immigrants, but also does not have the deterrence of enforcement without the backing of the USA.

Ukraine could be included into the EU border protection force. This can be done by having a shared service (border protection service) for EU members and associates (including candidate members).

NOT THE EU but the United European Border Enforcement (UEBE)! A cooperation of all EU member (and associates) armies. A kind of NATO for the EU, based on protecting the EU and its associates borders. 

The EUBE should have its own political chamber, existing of the defense ministers of the associated countries. They should have a weighted voted based on the number of people they represent. And voting should be done by 2/3 majority, without veto. And they should have a clear mandate for border protection, including against aggressive tress passers like armies of countries outside the associates.

So the NATO marines will become part of the ARE (Atlantic Rules and Enforcement). And the NATO air forces and ground forces in the EU and associates will become the EUBE. And the NATO has no role for the land borders of Europe anymore.


FORGET ABOUT THE USA, MOVE ON!


 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The worn out world order

Context Humanity is an ever-changing organism. Modern society is railed by rules, standards, and laws. In recent history, several attempts have been made to unify humanity and have common laws. Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 for example. And the League of Nations . And finally the United Nations . Parallel to the good intentions, group powers and armament developed. And this painted an evolving picture for the reality of all good intentions embedded in the UN and such. Causing these intentions becoming obsolete time and time again. And thus also the UN. Russia goes its own way. Islamic extremists like Iran go their own way. All undermining the so-called global rule based society.  The Russian invasion of Ukraine triggered a whole new power and armament reality. As happened in the past, all kind of new technology pops up that did not exist when the last time armament was tested in real battle. And again, painting a complete new power picture. Russia and China appear not to be t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Left versus right as political classification is obsolete

The obsolete model What Wikipedia says about it. On this type of political spectrum , left-wing politics and right-wing politics are often presented as opposed, although a particular individual or group may take a left-wing stance on one matter and a right-wing stance on another; and some stances may overlap and be considered either left-wing or right-wing depending on the ideology. In France, where the terms originated, the left has been called "the party of movement" or liberal , and the right "the party of order" or conservative . The three class view If we look to the history of politics, we can clearly recognize another aspect of dominant division that is actual more critical to type political movements, namely nation central dominance (controlled) versus "Laissez Faire" ( let it be) . Communists and (National) Socialists are clear historic examples of controlled politics. And nowadays, all technocrat politics have a tendency to soft or hard cro...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why "tax" is becoming an old-fashioned word

The globalization of the past decades will have language consequences in the future. One of them will be the disappearance of the word tax. Its replacement (the modern equivalent) will be public service cost. I explain why: About the randomness of tax Where and what to pay tax for? People in a city environment (modern global society) need good public services and people are willing to pay for it. We (the free world people) require roads; public transport; an education network; a value exchange system (money); electronic communications (internet); air transport hubs (airports) and so on. All necessary for modern life. And all only possible if we work somehow together to maintain them. Three main categories of public services. If you analyze what main types of public services there are, they can be classified into three groups: security-services; network-services and care-services. Security services Security services are needed to prevent threats to have impact. And fight the impact of a...
Post a Comment
Read more