Skip to main content

Left versus right as political classification is obsolete

The obsolete model

What Wikipedia says about it.

On this type of political spectrum, left-wing politics and right-wing politics are often presented as opposed, although a particular individual or group may take a left-wing stance on one matter and a right-wing stance on another; and some stances may overlap and be considered either left-wing or right-wing depending on the ideology. In France, where the terms originated, the left has been called "the party of movement" or liberal, and the right "the party of order" or conservative.

The three class view

If we look to the history of politics, we can clearly recognize another aspect of dominant division that is actual more critical to type political movements, namely nation central dominance (controlled) versus "Laissez Faire" (let it be). Communists and (National) Socialists are clear historic examples of controlled politics. And nowadays, all technocrat politics have a tendency to soft or hard crowd control. The World Economic Forum is a typical example of this. Also, belief systems linked to dogma's about social organization and prescribe laws can be classified as controlled.

The tensions in modern society are often still labeled left or right but, in my view, completely pointless. Because more often de issue is more about Controlled versus Let it be. And what used to be right, these days, is often technocratic focused control based. Just like communists are.

If we look at the way governments dealt with 'Wuhan Flu', the political debate about how to control it had nothing to do with left or right, but was frequently framed to be so. In fact, it was all about government control versus let it be.

The question to ask for classifying policies today therefor, I think, should be; What role the government should have? And what the government is for? What do we (the people) expect from a government?

I then recognize three herds (groups) of people based on social engagement and expectations from governments:

  • The people who think (or have learned to think) that a government is like a natural phenomenon. I call them "the Geese". (The majority of the ignorant people)
  • The people who know the government is a business with a guarantied cash flow and seek to benefit from that. I call them “the Parasites”. (The people with all kind of good stories why they should have a part of the tax pie but never talking about the real story). The parasite-class.
  • The people who work and like to solve problems, collective (together). In public services, or in non-governmental clubs. I call them “the Workers”. The Tackle-class.
The Geese and Parasites have a preference for control. The Geese for full control by the government. The Parasites for control by business and/or government (what ever benefits them the most)
The workers take responsibility for their social environment and work together for the collective benefit, they expect governments to provide good public services without interfering in their daily lives.
 
The big picture on the tensions in society today is (I think) the Parasites and the Geese versus the Workers.
If you study to get a good life, you aim to benefit from the Geese or to be member of the Parasitic-class.
If you go to university to learn, because you are curious, you probably identify as a member of the Tackle-class (Workers).
 

Historic perspective

One could argue that in feudal times there were only Geese (workers without education can also be considered to be Geese) and Parasites. That over time, when a middle class arose from the Geese, it positioned itself there. While fighting for emancipation of the lower and middle classes, this group clearly opposed the parasites (in the start of the process still mainly nobility). So we got the easy left versus right classification of society politics.
But progress, mainly due to increasing prosperity and education, has made this simple division obsolete. The real issue now is not emancipation, but how to organize society after the last emancipation have been done.

At the same time, we can see the end of the imperialism developing as a consequence of globalization. With its own legal and defense challenges. Consequently, this issue (how to organize society) is a global issue.

What are you?

What class are you? A Goose, a Parasitic, or a Tackle. Or a mix?










Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The worn out world order

Context Humanity is an ever-changing organism. Modern society is railed by rules, standards, and laws. In recent history, several attempts have been made to unify humanity and have common laws. Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 for example. And the League of Nations . And finally the United Nations . Parallel to the good intentions, group powers and armament developed. And this painted an evolving picture for the reality of all good intentions embedded in the UN and such. Causing these intentions becoming obsolete time and time again. And thus also the UN. Russia goes its own way. Islamic extremists like Iran go their own way. All undermining the so-called global rule based society.  The Russian invasion of Ukraine triggered a whole new power and armament reality. As happened in the past, all kind of new technology pops up that did not exist when the last time armament was tested in real battle. And again, painting a complete new power picture. Russia and China appear not to be t...

Why "tax" is becoming an old-fashioned word

The globalization of the past decades will have language consequences in the future. One of them will be the disappearance of the word tax. Its replacement (the modern equivalent) will be public service cost. I explain why: About the randomness of tax Where and what to pay tax for? People in a city environment (modern global society) need good public services and people are willing to pay for it. We (the free world people) require roads; public transport; an education network; a value exchange system (money); electronic communications (internet); air transport hubs (airports) and so on. All necessary for modern life. And all only possible if we work somehow together to maintain them. Three main categories of public services. If you analyze what main types of public services there are, they can be classified into three groups: security-services; network-services and care-services. Security services Security services are needed to prevent threats to have impact. And fight the impact of a...