Skip to main content

How do we save NATO from the coming Wall-Street collapse?

How do we save NATO from the coming Wall-Street collapse?

One of the issues with security is that it comes at a price.

How do we ensure that the price continues to be paid even if the monetary (US$) system collapse.

This is one of the main questions I'm working on these days.

Why do I believe Wall-Street will collapse?

Until now, all monetary systems are based on a balance in tax-flow versus debt-flow over time. That means that governments play a key role in the monetary system. In a global economy, it is the dominant government playing a key role. It has the anchor currency benefit.

Because of its geographic, the USA is, and will remain to be, the dominant government. But in a more wealthy world, it is becoming relatively smaller and thus less dominant. Thus losing its anchor function.

The world can rely on the USA navy to protect shipping routs because of its current status. But can this key feature of protecting free trade be maintained by a tax/debt balance of one (relatively shrinking) nation?

The obvious answer is no!

What do we need?

We need a new globally accepted monetary system outside the control of nations. A system accepted by all people for (global) trade.

Why outside the control of nations?

We have learned how nations block global progress for their own interests in the UN. From that, we know that a nation's based system can work against the interest of humanity. And against the interest of the global police force (NATO).

The system should be inflation resistant. And have a (non-governmental) store of value function.

System requirements

  • Globally accepted
  • Nation independent
  • Inflation resistant
  • Have a non-governmental store of value function


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Left versus right as political classification is obsolete

The obsolete model What Wikipedia says about it. On this type of political spectrum , left-wing politics and right-wing politics are often presented as opposed, although a particular individual or group may take a left-wing stance on one matter and a right-wing stance on another; and some stances may overlap and be considered either left-wing or right-wing depending on the ideology. In France, where the terms originated, the left has been called "the party of movement" or liberal , and the right "the party of order" or conservative . The three class view If we look to the history of politics, we can clearly recognize another aspect of dominant division that is actual more critical to type political movements, namely nation central dominance (controlled) versus "Laissez Faire" ( let it be) . Communists and (National) Socialists are clear historic examples of controlled politics. And nowadays, all technocrat politics have a tendency to soft or hard cro
Post a Comment
Read more

The battle of the oceans

We often talk about 'the west' but there is more to it, I think. And this (more) has major implications on geopolitics. We should talk about the (autocratic) land people culture versus the (free) sea people culture. Is it the war for Ukraine and the potential war for Taiwan, or is there a deeper war going on? I think the latter. Let me explain. I see the world moving forward from a (land) nations dominated organization into a free space network organization. I can see a history of wars between freedom and serfdom. The most brutal ones have been the wars of the west and Japan against China. Think about the brutal Opium wars and the Second Sino Japanese War . And the permanent battle with sea powers surrounding it from the Russian Empire in all its forms of appearance (Communistic or not) till today. We live in a time when these wars culminate into global conflicts and new wars. Probably and hopefully the final wars. Beijing, Moscow, Vienna, and Paris have one thing in common, t
Post a Comment
Read more