Skip to main content

Posts

Trade; real cost and import restrictions

Europe management is failing in a lot of areas in my view. And one of them is the real cost of Europe's laws. Trade for example. For open and honest trade, a level playing field and real humanity cost are fundamental and rarely taken into account because politics is too much a tug of war over personal or group interests. Today, the issue is what to do with the changed car manufacturing landscape. EV's changed the whole landscape. Investments from the resent passed are getting lost fast, and new investments are needed. In the same time, the demographic developments change the investment landscape. And in Europe again the tribes are starting a tug of war. Germany and Spain are the biggest car producers and want their business interest protected. But what is the real cost for humanity? We (humanity wide) should establish trade rules that ensure the lowest cost possible long term. I would like to introduce the full life cycle real cost model [FuLiCyReCoMo] for that. A kind of kick
Recent posts

The worn out world order

Context Humanity is an ever-changing organism. Modern society is railed by rules, standards, and laws. In recent history, several attempts have been made to unify humanity and have common laws. Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 for example. And the League of Nations . And finally the United Nations . Parallel to the good intentions, group powers and armament developed. And this painted an evolving picture for the reality of all good intentions embedded in the UN and such. Causing these intentions becoming obsolete time and time again. And thus also the UN. Russia goes its own way. Islamic extremists like Iran go their own way. All undermining the so-called global rule based society.  The Russian invasion of Ukraine triggered a whole new power and armament reality. As happened in the past, all kind of new technology pops up that did not exist when the last time armament was tested in real battle. And again, painting a complete new power picture. Russia and China appear not to be the p

Forget about Left versus Right

Forget about Left versus Right. Left/ Right What Wikipedia says about it. On this type of political spectrum , left-wing politics and right-wing politics are presented often as opposed, although a particular individual or group may take a left-wing stance on one matter and a right-wing stance on another; and some stances may overlap and be considered either left-wing or right-wing depending on the ideology. In France, where the terms originated, the left has been called “the party of movement” or liberal , and the right “the party of order” or conservative . Very outdated, because some “left-positions” have become Marxist conservative. The three class view If we look to the history of politics, we can clearly recognize another aspect of dominant division that is actual more critical to type political movements, namely nation central dominance (controlled) versus "Laissez Faire" (let it be). Communists and (National) Socialists are clear historic examples of controlled

The edge of language science

The edge of language science. Two questions. Is there a scientific ranking of language efficiency? I suppose that a Chinese whisper  will have different outcomes for the loss of information for different languages. And this could be measurement for language efficiency. Why are there more problems and corruption in former French colonies than there is in former English colonies? My assumption is that this is because the way French shapes the thoughts of its speakers. And somehow French causes more misunderstanding. A example is Hispaniola . The French part ( Haiti ) is always in problems, while the Dominican Republic is less so. My theory is that the Celtic languages disappeared because they were less efficient. And they are less efficient because of the culture of playing with the semantics. By playing with semantics groups could identify themselves among themselves. Like a secret sauce over the language for the group. More poetic and playful, but less clear. French has maintained this

The Dirty thought behind Green energy

The Dirty thought behind Green energy  

Update of the Free World People Website

By working every week few hours on it, the Freeworldpeople.org websites is getting more and more informative. Worthwhile to take a peek once a week and to follow me on this blog. How to follow a blog, YouTube channels, and newspapers without the distraction of X and WhatsApp: Use a feed reader like Feedly or Flipboard . OR one of the many other feed aggregators .

One China Two legal systems

Worth while to see the speech by Lai Ching-Te, the new Taiwanese president. Xi says China is one inclusive Taiwan. But in his speech to the people of Taiwan, the new Taiwanese president Lai Ching-Te makes clear that Taiwan is a Free World People China. Something what can not be said about mainland China.